Educational change is a central topic of inquiry in education, and also a recognized field of study, as exemplified in the International Handbook of Educational Change, the Journal of Educational Change, a special interest group of the American Educational Research Association devoted to educational change, and widely used texts by founding authors of the field on core concepts such as the meaning of educational change. In the past, eagerness about what to change overlooked the complex processes of how people changed or failed to change in practice. The field therefore addresses and analyzes deliberately designed as well as implicit and unintended processes of educational change, such as innovation, implementation, improvement and resistance; the forces that drive change externally in policy and society and internally within schools and classrooms; the orchestration by and impact of change on its various agents, such as teachers, students, parents, and leaders; the experience and articulation of change across various educational domains such as pedagogy, curriculum, and assessment; and the evolution of change processes and change strategies over time, as well as their geographical distribution and variation across different systems and countries. The movement of research and development activity beyond simply what to change toward how to change, and the causes and consequences of these change processes, started in the post-Sputnik era of the 1960s in the United States, which addressed the problem of diffusion of individual innovations. Difficulties in achieving successful diffusion then prompted an interest in planned educational change, though this approach was criticized in turn for neglecting the various meanings that people attached to the change process as they experienced it. This resulted in an increasing emphasis on creating more collaborative professional cultures and professional communities in schools to develop common purpose and shared meanings. The impact of these changes since 1970 has been waves of reform that have left many educators confused and burned out, many schools with a seemingly haphazard string of unconnected reforms, and still many students not achieving. By the turn of the 21st century, frustration with these successive waves of change efforts ushered in an era of large-scale, administratively and politically coordinated reform initiatives and their uneven effects, as played out in different systems and countries across the globe—especially those that perform the strongest on international tests of educational achievement and those that are increasingly left behind. This entry explores the key literature and research on these processes and patterns of educational change, and their variations across time and space.
This section includes some of the most influential and classic texts in educational change and reform. Divided into three timeframes—1960–1974, 1975–1989, and 1990–present—these works comprise the first consciously constructed forms of change and demonstrate the growth of thinking in the field of educational reform from its earliest days. The most recent pieces detail modern educational change from multiple perspectives.
These early classic texts also deal with some of the first consciously constructed forms of change, especially innovation, as well as presenting the first ideas about the developmental stages through which change processes pass. To read about the concept of organizational learning, see Argyris and Schon 1974. For a critique of the cultures of silence that surround the notion of banking education and the development of a new pedagogy arising from the concerns of oppressed communities, see Freire 1970. For a discussion of planned educational change, see Gross, et al. 1971 and Havelock 1973. For details on school innovation and planned change, see Hoyle 1969. For a discussion of loss and change, see Marris 1974. To better understand diffusion of innovations, see Rogers 1962. To explore culture and change, see Sarason 1971. To read about educational innovation in a classroom setting, see Griffin, et al. 2012 (cited under Innovation) and Smith and Geoffrey 1968.
These classic pieces, written between 1975 and 1989, demonstrate the growth of thinking in the field of educational reform from its earliest days. For a view on the study of change implementation, see Berman and McLaughlin 1975. To better understand change in teaching practices over a century, see Cuban 1984. To learn about the Concerns-Based Adoption Model (CBAM), see Hall and Loucks 1979. For a look at the first analysis of educational change from the technological, political, and cultural perspectives, see House 1979. Huberman and Miles 1984 is one of the first analyses of process and outcomes of innovations, and Lortie 1975 is the foundational book on the culture of teaching.
These important texts detail modern educational change from multiple perspectives. For a better understanding of the three-stage theory of educational change—initiation, implementation, and institutionalization—see Fullan 2007. This book is the most widely cited in the field and is the most recently revised version. To better understand change in urban high schools, see Louis and Miles 1990. For an analysis of learning organizations, see Senge 1990.
This section contains pivotal pieces that offer approaches and strategies to bring about and sustain educational change. Included are works on the most current thinking in innovation, policy and program implementation, the sustainability and institutionalism of educational reform, restructuring and reculturing of schools, and building professional learning communities.
Some approaches and strategies to bring about change are based on single innovations. The pieces in this section reflect the most current thinking in the area of innovation. For a view of innovation and diffusion theory in the 21st century, see Bentley 2010. To better understand the impact of disruptive innovation in education, see Christensen, et al. 2008.
This section explores the complexities and challenges facing schools as they implement various educational reforms. In particular, it focuses on various aspects of implementation, including policy implementation and program implementation. For an overview of policy implementation see Honig 2006 and McLaughlin 1998. To better understand evaluating program implementation, see Leithwood and Montgomery 1980. For an exploration of the implementation of planned change, see McLaughlin 1990. For a definition and in-depth exploration of implementation as it relates to curriculum research, see O’Donnell 2008. For scaling up school reform, see Datnow, et al. 2002.
In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to the sustainability of changes over time and across systems. Anderson 2010 examines the evolution of change over time. Hargreaves and Goodson 2006 details change over a thirty-year period in the United States and Canada and explores the sustainability of change in these contexts. Hargreaves 2002 explores how social geographies contribute to or undermine sustainable improvements. Meyer and Rowan 1977 and Meyer and Rowan 2012 looks at the ways in which organizational structures affect innovation or change in schools.
Change efforts sometimes try to transform organizations by restructuring them, whereas others concentrate more on alterations of relationships and interactions through “reculturing.” To learn about the role of micropolitics in educational reform, see Blasé and Bjork 2010. To better understand how districts have been restructured, see Brouillette 1996. For a view of the role of trust in school improvement, see Bryk and Schneider 2002. To read more about the role of collaboration as a means of educational reform, see Darling-Hammond 1997. To read about leadership in a culture of change, see Fullan 2001. For a deeper look at school restructuring, see Lieberman 1995 and Newmann and Wehlage 1995. For a better understanding of how prevailing cultural beliefs perpetuate inequality in an urban high school, see McQuillan 1998. For a look at lack of change in teaching pedagogies over time related to educational reform and policy, see Cuban 2013.
One of the forms of reculturing schools is the development of professional learning communities. The following works describe the evolution of professional learning communities and discuss the challenges to implementation as well as the possibilities for improvement. For a differentiation of professional learning communities from performance-training sects, see Hargreaves 2002. For a definition of professional learning communities and an exploration of what happens when schools develop them, see Hord 1997. To look at the establishment of collaborative cultures, see Lieberman 1990. To see how building professional learning communities can improve student achievement, see McLaughlin and Talbert 2006. To read about creating communities of learning in a context of accountability and standardization, see Meier 2002. To read about some of the challenges of professional learning communities, see Stoll and Louis 2007. To learn about creating successful learning environments through leadership, see Robertson and Timperley 2011.
Recently, change strategy has concentrated on interrelated changes orchestrated centrally that may depend on pressures and demands or on capacity building and support, and that in turn can provoke organized responses that take the form of social movements. To read about social movements in the United States, see Anyon 2005 and Oakes, et al. 2000. To see an analysis of the impact of poverty on systemic change, see Berliner 2006. For perspectives on the travel of school reform approaches from one system to another, see Datnow, et al. 2002 and Stein, et al. 2010. For a better understanding of large-scale reform efforts, see Elmore 1995 and Hargreaves 2010. To read the insights of some of the leading educational change experts on systemic reform, see Hargreaves and Fullan 2008. For a view of system leadership, see Hopkins 2007. For some ideas on global educational change and reform from leading experts in the field, see Malone 2013.
This section encompasses historical perspectives on systemic educational reform. To read about how systemic changes have thus far proven unsuccessful, as well as suggestions for improvement, see Hargreaves and Shirley 2009, Payne 2008, Ravitch 2010, Ravitch 2000, and Sarason 1990. To read about how certain reforms have come to be permanent features of school, see Tyack and Tobin 1994.
This section provides international perspectives on systemic education reform, drawing largely from research in the United Kingdom and Canada since 1980. To further understand the challenges to education systems posed by increased globalization, see Arnove, et al. 2012. To read about large-scale reform in the United Kingdom, see Barber 2009; Chapman and Gunter 2009; Earl, et al. 2003; and Gray 2010. To read about Canadian systemic educational reform, see Fullan 2004. For an inclusive educational perspective, see Sahlberg 2006. For large-scale change efforts, see Hopkins 2011.
Struggling schools face difficult choices when making decisions about school improvement. This section identifies several school improvement options, including turnaround. To read about turnaround leadership, see Fullan 2006. To read about improving schools in challenging circumstances, see Harris, et al. 2006. To challenge current thinking on leadership, see Harris, et al. 2003. For perspectives on school improvement, see Hopkins 2001. To read about the link between knowledge utilization and school improvement, see Louis 1998. For views on the link between school effectiveness and school improvement see Reynolds, et al. 2000; Stoll and Fink 1996; and Townsend 2007. To read a critique of turnaround strategies, see Mintrop 2004.
Organizations can learn and improve by reflecting on their own practices, sharing ideas with individuals both inside and outside the organization through inquiry and networking, and building capacity by learning from within. To read about networking for educational change, see Chapman and Hadfield 2010, Daly 2010, and Lieberman and Wood 2002. For perspectives on inquiry, see Cochran-Smith and Lytle 1992. For perspectives on capacity building, see Elmore 2004 and Hatch 2009. To read about how organizations learn and improve, see Mulford 1998 and Supovitz 2010.
The works in this section represent multiple perspectives on educational change agents—those who initiate, implement, experience, and respond to educational changes. Included are articles, chapters, and books related to such topics as defining change agents and the skills associated with change agency; the impact of governments, communities, and schools on educational change and the role that each of these bodies has in educational change; and the impact of change on teachers and teachers’ agency in the context of reform. From these pivotal pieces, it is clear that the change both originates and is also felt deeply at all levels, from the macro level of nations down to the micro level of individual schools. It is also clear that the perspective of change agents themselves as they navigate the turbulent waters of complex and often contradictory educational changes must be taken into consideration, both by the communities in which these agents act and at the policy level, where decisions about these agents are typically determined.
This section describes the effects of change on teachers, as well as the skills educators need to become change agents. For an elucidation of the professionalism hypothesis, see Darling-Hammond 2009. To read about the effects of change on teachers’ morale, job satisfaction, and motivation, see Evans 2000. To read about the human meaning of change for educators, see Evans 1996. For a view of the impact of change on teachers’ work in the postmodern age, see Hargreaves 1994. For an examination of the relationship between professionals inside school and agents outside it, see Hargreaves and Fullan 1998. Finally, to better understand the skills educational change agents need, see Miles, et al. 1988.
National governments are among the most common agents, with great power not only to initiate but also to mediate change across the system. For an examination of what high-performing national school systems have in common, see Barber and Mourshed 2007. For a look at Singapore’s school-based curriculum development, see Gopinathan and Deng 2006. To better understand how school systems are improved around the world, see Mourshed, et al. 2010. To understand Finland’s educational change experience, see Sahlberg 2010. For international comparisons of student learning outcomes, see Schleicher 2010. To view the state of curriculum research in a global context, see Pinar 2013. To examine the problems of the American educational system in the context of the demands of the global knowledge economy, see Wagner 2008. Finally, to see China as a case study of systemic educational reform, see Zhao and Qiu 2010.
Parents and communities can act as agents of educational reform, spearheading efforts that reflect areas in need of improvement in light of community needs. For an examination of social movement organizing and equity-focused educational change, see Renee, et al. 2010. On the role of community organizing in educational change, see Shirley 1997. To look at educational change through the lens of alternate teacher education programs, see Skinner, et al. 2011.
Schools are not only places where educational change occurs. Rather, schools themselves can act as change agents by creating, supporting, challenging, or sustaining reform. To see how schools create conditions for change in schools, see Barth 1991, Duke 1995, and Reeves 2009. For a view of the relationship between internally developed and externally imposed change, see Goodson 2002. To see how schools work as professional learning communities to prepare students for a world of creativity and flexibility, see Hargreaves 2003. For a look at how schools have amplified educational conservatism while altering its nature to fit the current culture and political economy of fast capitalism, see Hargreaves and Shirley 2009. To see workplace conditions of school success, see Little 1982. For an analysis of the organizational and political pressures facing non-traditional schools, such as magnet schools, see Metz 1986.
The impact of educational reform on teachers’ agency is varied. Reform can act as a powerful force on teachers, changing their practice in deep and meaningful ways. It can also have more negative effects, including isolation, attrition, marginalization, and de-professionalism. For an exploration of new teachers’ resistance to change, see Achinstein and Ogawa 2006. To see the impact of mandated change on teachers, see Bailey 2000. For an exploration of how teachers’ career stages, life factors, commitment, and professional working environments affect their efficacy, see Day, et al. 2007. For teacher development viewed through innovative school efforts, see Fullan and Hargreaves 1992. On the realities of change for reform-minded teachers, see Hargreaves, et al. 2001. For an exploration of teachers’ emotional responses to change, see Hargreaves 2004. For the impact of life, career, and generation on teachers’ emotional responses to educational change, see Hargreaves 2005. For an exploration of the constraints and possibilities of educational practice in light of contemporary realities, see Lieberman and Miller 1999. For an examination of conflict in teacher communities as a catalyst for school change, see Avila de Lima 2001. To better understand autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional relations, see Little 1990. To further understand identity, diversity, and educational change, see Skerrett 2011.
The effects of change can be felt differently for teachers working at the primary and secondary levels. At the primary level, where teachers are not always subject-specific and where departmental cultures are not pervasive, primary teachers struggle with change in ways unique to their environment. For the challenges facing adolescents related to school reform, see Earl, et al. 1996. For a description of how primary teachers see themselves and their work, see Nias 1989. For an examination of primary teachers’ responses to change, see Woods, et al. 1997.
Change is often difficult at the secondary level, where size, bureaucratic complexity, subject traditions, and identifications factor into relationships and decision making. For an understanding of change at the secondary level in the United States and Canada over a thirty-year period, see Goodson, et al. 2006. To better understand the professional life cycle of teachers, see Huberman 1989. To examine the career trajectories of secondary teachers who have experienced reform, see Little 1996. For a look at teachers’ responses to change in a comprehensive school setting in the United Kingdom, see Riseborough 1981.
This section explores the different domains of activity and organization in which educational change occurs. Through the domains covered here, substantive evolutions of educational change over time are evident, in particular the impact of heightened accountability and standardization.
This section details curriculum and teaching, as well as learning, standards, and accountability, as important domains in which educational change occurs. To see the role of the system in supporting data-driven decision making, see Datnow and Park 2010. For an exploration of the impact of state testing on inquiry-based science, refer to Falk and Drayton 2004. To better understand the historical development and evolution of school subjects, see Goodson 1993. To explore the concept of curriculum and the practice of curriculum theory, see Goodson 1997. For perspectives on the impact of standardized testing, see McNeil 2000. For an analysis of the current state of America’s school system, see Ravitch 2011.
This section explores the different domains of activity and organization in which educational change occurs, focusing on the role and impact of school organization in educational change. In each domain, scholars have looked at school organization and culture to consider their role in promoting, supporting, resisting, achieving, and sustaining meaningful change. For an exploration of the micro-politics of school, see Ball 1987. To better understand politics, markets, and the organization of schools, see Chubb and Moe 1988. For a description of the evolution of innovation strategies and a look at which strategies will most effectively develop the 21st-century school, see Dalin 1998. For a detailed description of whole-school reform focused on the collaboration of educators and politicians, see Fullan 2010. For an exploration of the role of departmental cultures in reform, see McLaughlin and Talbert 2001. To look at the impact of reforms on individuals, classrooms, and schools, and in particular the Coalition of Essential Schools, see McQuillan and Muncey 1996. For an analysis of social, economic, and educational trends worldwide, see Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 1991. To look at the challenges facing the modern American high school, see Powell, et al. 1985. For an analysis of the way contemporary schools run and the impact of these practices on student learning, see Sizer 1984.
One of the greatest factors influencing educational change is the demographics of the people who populate the region served. This section explores the role of these demographic factors in educational change. Included are the need to consider race, class, language, and gender in reform and how to create more equitable teaching and learning for urban schools and underserved populations through inclusive education practices.
This section considers the role of race, class, and language in educational change. For an insightful theory of change through the lens of race, see Connolly and Troyna 1998. To further understand the culture of power and pedagogy in teaching Black and poor students, see Delpit 1988 and Fordham 1996. For a look at how language and culture influence student learning, see Fecho 2003 and Philips 1983. For suggestions on policy reform and teacher preparation in diverse international settings, see Skerret 2008 and Skerret and Hargreaves 2008.
Reforms embracing a multicultural perspective help to create more equitable teaching and learning for all students. For practical suggestions and tools to provide inclusive and multicultural teaching, see Banks 2004. For advice on policy development and teaching for empowerment in diverse linguistic and cultural contexts, see Cummins 1996, Nieto 2005, and Nieto 2010. For ideas on community involvement in schools with diverse student populations, see Valdés 1996. To further understand the importance of culturally responsive and socioculturally conscious teaching, see Valenzuela 1999 and Villegas and Lucas 2002. To explore student-centered, critical, and democratic pedagogy, see Shor 2012.
There is a great need for equity-focused reforms and policies in many urban schools. This section highlights works that consider new paradigms for understanding social and educational injustice (see Anyon 2005) and suggestions for closing the achievement gap in urban schools (see Noguera 2003). For a history of class politics and public schooling in the United States, see Wrigley 1982. For a grounded theory of critical literacy pedagogy, see Morrell 2008. For suggestions on creating more equitable schools using social and political movements outside the field of education, see Oakes and Lipton 2002. For a cultural ecological model of school change, see Ogbu 1974. For a discussion on education reform and social change, see Walsh 1996.
The works in this section consider the role of gender in educational change and reform. For a historical examination of women in educational administration, see Blackmore 1996 and Shakeshaft 1989. For a discussion on the relationship of gender to micro-politics in secondary schools, see Datnow 2003.
This works in this section consider the need for sustainable change and fostering inclusive values and practices in schools. For a broader definition of inclusion, including issues of equity, participation, and the role of community in sustaining equitable reform, see Ainscow, et al. 2006. For the role of organizational cultures and leadership in developing inclusive educational practices, see Ainscow and Sandill 2010.
This section includes key books, articles, and book chapters that discuss theories of educational change. Included are topics on non-change, stage development and institutional theories, concepts of personal, emotional, and psychodynamic reactions to change, and orientations to and responses to change. Pivotal historical works on change theories are also included.
The works in this section consider educational change from the perspective of growth, learning, and stage development. For details on how to use social network theory to enact and sustain educational change, see Daly 2010. For an understanding of the five dimensions of schooling in implementing reform, see Eisner 1992. For a look at how partnerships among educators, communities, and governments can create learning societies and sustain reform, see Fullan 1993 and Senge 2010. To further understand large-scale transformation and complex change, see Fullan 2001. For a synthesis of existing theoretical perspectives on educational change, see Paulson 1977.
The success of educational reform depends on those implementing the reform: the teachers and administrators. The works in this section discuss these educators’ emotions and psychodynamic responses to change. For insight into reform behind the scenes and suggestions for those leading and managing change, see James 2010. For details on teachers’ emotions in the context of reform and the implications of change for these individuals, see van Veen and Sleegers 2006 and Zembylas 2010.
This section includes works that consider the social and organizational behavior of principals and schools as influenced by the wider social structure such as rules, norms, and routines. For consideration of the effects of control-oriented principals on teacher performance, see Blasé 1990. To see how institutional theory may be applied to educational reform initiatives, see Burch 2007. For a framework on how to lead, evaluate, and explain the success or failure of educational reform, see Duke 2004.
There are many reasons for the lack of change in schools. This works in this section review some of these reasons, including the difficulty of challenging long-held power structures, and the attrition of innovative practices over time. Angus and Mirel 1999 explains some the reasons for the failure and loss of momentum of differentiated curriculum and makes suggestions for future reform efforts. Fink 2000 discusses the “attrition of change” using six conceptual structures.
This works in this section offer an examination of the history, role, and controversies of public schooling in American society. For a synopsis of US educational reform, see Miles 1998 and Ravitch 1983. For insight into how economics, community, and power structures have influenced American schooling, see Nespor 1997 and Tyack and Cuban 1995. For a look at the historical development of US curriculum, see Willis, et al. 1994.